Find or Sell Motorcycles & Scooters in USA

2005 Harley-davidson Touring on 2040-motos

US $6,500.00
YearYear:2005 MileageMileage:34442 ColorColor: Gold
Location:

Lathrop, California, United States

Lathrop, California, United States
QR code
2005 Harley-Davidson Touring, US $6,500.00, image 1

Harley-Davidson Touring photos

2005 Harley-Davidson Touring, US $6,500.00, image 2 2005 Harley-Davidson Touring, US $6,500.00, image 3 2005 Harley-Davidson Touring, US $6,500.00, image 4 2005 Harley-Davidson Touring, US $6,500.00, image 5 2005 Harley-Davidson Touring, US $6,500.00, image 6 2005 Harley-Davidson Touring, US $6,500.00, image 7

Harley-Davidson Touring tech info

Engine Size (cc)Engine Size (cc):1688 TypeType:Touring For Sale ByFor Sale By:Dealer WarrantyWarranty:Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty

Harley-Davidson Touring description

Moto blog

Harley-Davidson Reports Q1 2012 Results

Wed, 25 Apr 2012

Harley-Davidson reported a 20.3% increase in motorcycle sales over the first quarter of 2012, including a 25.5% increase in the United States. According to Harley-Davidson‘s first quarter report, The Motor Company sold 59,677 motorcycles, worldwide, up from the 49,595 motorcycles reported in the same quarter of 2011. U.S.

Harley-Davidson Reports Q1 2014 Sales Results

Tue, 22 Apr 2014

Harley-Davidson kicked off its 2014 fiscal year with a first quarter net income of $265.9 million, an 18.1% increase from the profit reported in the same period of 2013. Consumers purchased 57,415 new Harley-Davidson motorcycles worldwide in the first quarter, up 5.8% from the 54,254 units sold in Q1 2013. U.S.

Marlon Brando Estate Files Suit Against Harley-Davidson

Tue, 17 May 2011

Brando Enterprises, an operating entity that protects the Marlon Brando brand on behalf of the actor’s family, has filed a lawsuit against Harley-Davidson. The suit alleges Harley-Davidson used the legendary actor’s name without a license for a leather riding boot called “The Brando”. “It is interesting that Harley-Davidson – a company that is vigorously protective of its own brand – would seek to exploit an iconic property without benefit of a licensing agreement,” says  Jeffrey I.