Find or Sell Motorcycles & Scooters in USA

2000 Harley-davidson Touring on 2040-motos

US $8,500.00
YearYear:2000 MileageMileage:39177 ColorColor: Black
Location:

McDonough, Georgia, United States

McDonough, Georgia, United States
QR code
2000 Harley-Davidson Touring, US $8,500.00, image 1

Harley-Davidson Touring photos

2000 Harley-Davidson Touring, US $8,500.00, image 2 2000 Harley-Davidson Touring, US $8,500.00, image 3 2000 Harley-Davidson Touring, US $8,500.00, image 4 2000 Harley-Davidson Touring, US $8,500.00, image 5 2000 Harley-Davidson Touring, US $8,500.00, image 6

Harley-Davidson Touring tech info

TypeType:Touring For Sale ByFor Sale By:Private Seller

Harley-Davidson Touring description

Moto blog

2012 Harley-Davidson Seventy-Two and Softail Slim Revealed

Thu, 02 Feb 2012

As expected, Harley-Davidson pulled the wraps off of two new 2012 models, the ’70s-styled Seventy-Two Sportster (pictured above) and the bobber-styled Softail Slim. Motorcycle.com‘s Tom Roderick attended the launch of the two new 2012 Harley-Davidson models and he’ll have a full report. In the mean time, here’s a quick look at the two new offerings from The Motor Company.Like the Forty-Eight first introduced in 2010, the 2012 Harley-Davidson Seventy-Two is named for the era that inspired its design.

Top Motorcycle News of 2009

Thu, 31 Dec 2009

The year is coming to a close so let’s take a look back at the top stories of 2009 in the world of motorcycles after the jump. Buell Motorcycles Shut Down Harley-Davidson made the shocking announcement Oct. 15 it would discontinue Buell Motorcycles.

Marlon Brando Estate Files Suit Against Harley-Davidson

Tue, 17 May 2011

Brando Enterprises, an operating entity that protects the Marlon Brando brand on behalf of the actor’s family, has filed a lawsuit against Harley-Davidson. The suit alleges Harley-Davidson used the legendary actor’s name without a license for a leather riding boot called “The Brando”. “It is interesting that Harley-Davidson – a company that is vigorously protective of its own brand – would seek to exploit an iconic property without benefit of a licensing agreement,” says  Jeffrey I.